"My field of interest is in processes, which is why I choose titles for royalty sales with the -ėjimas ending. "MOVING" refers to movement in some direction. The process of upbringing is based on the repetition of the given example, in other words, the phenomenon of "following in the footsteps of the parents", which is why I have chosen footwear as a narrative of the symbolic meaning of the footprint. The exhibits themselves are not as important to me as the titles and the brief insights, through which I try to convey to the viewers freely interpretable phenomena. I leave a lot of freedom for the visitors to imagine the subtleties of the education of Gen X, the generation in which I grew up, by questioning the meaning of violence as an educational tool. I see the change and capture its expression today. I do not impose my opinion on anyone and I do not condemn or judge in terms of what was better or what is better now. Today it is like this. My opinion will change over time (yes, time also leaves the PEDESAC ), so I deliberately avoid morality, but offer the viewer a gentle provocation. Repetition as a learning process is introduced at an early age through fairy tales, which use symbols to convey ancestral values, to define circumstances, and to use events to describe decisions and consequences. Fairy tales are embedded with codes of behaviour that lead to the desired outcome - the triumph of good over evil, the protagonist's journey towards spiritual wholeness. Over the last few years I have been exploring the original meaning and current interpretation of archaic fairy tales, myths, proverbs and folkloric elements. I reflect on what is still relevant. Inspiration has moved me away from the original idea of using only the symbolism of shoes, and the idea of hands as an active narrative element has emerged. The objects complemented each other, while violence remained the main axis. The attributes of the limbs are not in themselves instruments of violence, but rather they are characters marking certain phenomena. It could be argued that the objects become impersonal universals that I use for my own purposes.